The escalating feud between former allies Donald Trump and Elon Musk has taken an unexpected turn, with the U.S. President suggesting possible deportation for the billionaire entrepreneur. The clash began when Musk publicly criticized Trump’s flagship 2025 fiscal package—dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill—calling it a “disaster for innovation” and a “pork-filled handout program.” Musk accused the bill of increasing the federal deficit while favoring politically connected corporations over genuine technological progress.
Table of Contents
What Sparked the Feud Between Donald Trump and Elon Musk?
While Musk has never shied away from speaking his mind, this time he appeared to strike a nerve. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO also hinted at forming a centrist political party, fueling speculation about his growing political ambitions. These remarks came at a time when Trump is consolidating his second-term agenda and tightening control over federal spending. Musk’s criticism was not just economic—it was personal. The billionaire labeled Trump’s bill “fiscally insane” and “deeply anti-meritocratic,” prompting an aggressive response from the White House.
How Did Trump Respond to Musk’s Public Remarks?
President Trump’s retaliation came swiftly and sharply. Speaking at a campaign-style rally in Florida, Trump accused Musk of “biting the hand that fed him,” referencing the billions in federal contracts and subsidies Tesla and SpaceX have received over the past decade. Trump claimed that without U.S. government support, “Elon would still be tinkering with toy cars in Pretoria.”
Also Read: How Did Elon Musk’s DOGE Initiative Lose Nearly $1 Billion Overnight?
In a now-viral press statement, Trump even floated the idea of reviewing Musk’s citizenship and visa history, saying, “Maybe he goes back to South Africa. We’ll take a look at it.” He also promised to investigate Musk’s tax arrangements and revoke key federal contracts. While deportation threats may lack legal merit, they serve as political theater in Trump’s ongoing effort to frame himself as tough on perceived elites who oppose his agenda.
The president’s statements also included a direct warning: subsidies for Musk-led ventures could be “reevaluated immediately,” and any ongoing government partnerships—including NASA launches—might face abrupt cancellation.
What Is the Role of the DOGE Agency in This Conflict?
Ironically, the agency now caught in the crossfire was once led by Musk himself. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a Trump-era creation initially intended to streamline federal bureaucracy using private-sector innovation, was helmed by Musk during Trump’s first term. At the time, the move was seen as symbolic—a tech visionary helping to modernize bloated government systems.
Now, DOGE is reportedly being used to audit Musk’s financial ties with various government departments, from defense contracts with SpaceX to environmental subsidies for Tesla’s EV programs. Critics argue that Trump’s deployment of DOGE in this feud blurs the line between governance and personal vendetta. Nevertheless, Trump loyalists claim the agency is simply “doing its job” by reviewing potential waste or misuse of public funds.
Is Musk’s U.S. Residency or Citizenship Really at Risk?
While the threats make for viral headlines, legal experts say deporting Elon Musk is next to impossible. Musk became a U.S. citizen in 2002 after initially arriving on a student visa and later acquiring a green card. As a naturalized citizen, he cannot be deported unless found guilty of extremely serious crimes, such as treason or terrorism, which is not the case here.
Also Read: Was Elon Musk Right About America’s Political and Economic Crisis?
The president’s remarks likely serve more as political intimidation than an actual legal roadmap. Nevertheless, they highlight the precariousness of even high-profile immigrants in politically charged times. Some legal scholars warn that even suggesting deportation for political speech sets a dangerous precedent that could chill dissent among foreign-born citizens.
How Are Markets and Tech Companies Reacting to the Clash?
The Trump–Musk spat is already creating ripple effects in financial markets. Tesla shares dropped nearly 5% following Trump’s remarks, erasing billions in market value within hours. SpaceX, while privately held, is facing increased scrutiny over its reliance on government contracts for satellite launches and national security payloads.
Industry leaders have voiced concern that the feud could damage investor confidence and lead to a cooling of government–tech sector collaboration. “This isn’t just about Elon,” one Silicon Valley executive commented anonymously. “If a sitting president can target America’s most prominent innovator, who’s next?”
The rift may also impact future policy decisions on electric vehicles, space exploration, and renewable energy—areas where Musk’s companies are dominant players.
Could This Political Battle Shape the 2025 U.S. Election Landscape?
With Trump seeking to solidify his grip on Washington and Musk increasingly vocal in political discourse, their public clash is likely to have electoral consequences. Musk has a growing base of followers who view him as a symbol of meritocracy, innovation, and contrarian thinking. His criticism of Trump may embolden moderates and independents frustrated with extreme partisanship.
On the other hand, Trump’s base may interpret the confrontation as another example of the president standing up to elite billionaires who, in their view, undermine American sovereignty or democratic processes. For now, the 50501 Movement and “No Kings” protests in mid-June signal a brewing national discontent, and Musk’s statements only add fuel to the fire.
Whether or not Musk’s rumored political ambitions materialize, this feud could define how tech leaders engage with politics in a polarized America. It raises important questions about the future of public–private partnerships, the limits of executive power, and how dissent is treated in an age where wealth and influence collide with government muscle.
By
